
Project size, Programme and Cost
The Pilot Projects range in size from a single
house at Newbury, to a twenty-seven unit development at Maidenhead.
The size of the projects is a significant factor in assessing the performance
of the buildings. By definition a Pilot Project is likely to be harder
than a conventional one.
Despite the steep learning curve demanded by Pilot Projects, construction
time was generally good with programme times significantly shorter than
conventional construction. For example, the INTEGER West Bromwich development
took only 32 weeks to complete, around half of what might be expected
for a similarly complex project constructed in a conventional manner.
Costs were also generally favourable, and depending on range of features
were generally only of the order of 15% greater than standard construction.
It is to be expected that with larger roll-out projects, benefits of
scale, repetition and increasing industry familiarity with INTEGER techniques
that construction time and costs will reduce. However, construction
costs are only one part of the total lifetime cost of a building, and
costs in use are significantly lower for INTEGER projects. Target savings
of 50% energy and 40% water and reduced maintenance costs will be validated
for the Pilot Projects over time.